Lott Law Firm

Not available.

Austin Bertran

Matt Lott and Savannah brown are absolutely great lawyers, they really take passion into your case. I brought them a very complicated custody case and they handled emergency custody like the best in the business. Can’t wait to see what they help me with for custody trial in a few months. I highly recommend this law firm. Very helpful. Money well spent. Thank you Lott law firm for protecting my babies!

Alyssah Thorne

I cannot say enough wonderful things about Matt Lott Law Firm. He and his diligent team have gone above and beyond for us since the moment we walked through the door. They are truly a law firm that cares about the outcome of your case and will work endlessly to achieve the clients wants/needs. I highly recommend them!

Julia Roberts

Cannot recommend this team enough. Matthew & Amanda are extremely knowledgeable and truly have your best interest at heart. They went above and beyond for my case and I’m extremely grateful. Highly recommend for any wills / probate guidance!

Raven Beaudine

This attorney is dishonest and unethical. He represents a third party who forcefully and unlawfully removed two minor children from their biological mother's custody and then ran to the Jackson County Chancery Court to file a Complaint for Emergency Relief - Custody, committed fraud on the court, and never showed any evidence of her allegations. Jackson County did not even have subject-matter jurisdiction because the defendant's residence was in Biloxi, MS, which is in Harrison County when the case was filed. Attorneys take an oath and they are REQUIRED to remain professional and ethical. However, Matt Lott has sat in court and laughed at the defendant when showing clear signs of distress - stuttering and loss of memory (February 7, 2023). He has also shown up to court on numerous occasions and flat out lied in court. Example: the Chancery Court tried to transfer the illegal custody case to Jackson County Youth Court. The Youth Court doesnt legally have jurisdiction unless there are substantiated findings of abuse or neglect. So, the Youth Court initiated an investigation on the original allegations through MDCPS. On October 8th, 2025, the Youth Court closed the investigation and provided Defendant with a Findings letter that states that all of the allegations were unsubstantiated. The letter states that MDCPS doesnt recommend Youth Court involvement. Before they wrote the letter they asked if the defnedant wanted to participate with In Circle and the defendant said yes because the family needs the assistance since the family was suddenly and unlawfully ripped apart and as a result of that, they have all suffered severe trauma. MDCPS put in two different recommendations to In Circle. The first one was sent on September 3rd of 2025. The second one was sent sometime in early October, I believe it may have been October 7th or 8th. To this day, November 8, 2025, In Circle has not made any attempt to contact the defendant. After the findings letter was provided from MDCPS there was a Rule 60(b)(4) motion to Vacate Void Order for Lack of Jurisdiction filed and set on the docket. The hearing was held on November 7, 2025. However, Mr. Lott wouldnt allow the proceedings to move forward and he lied to the court in order to stop the proceedings from moving forward. Mr. Lott told Judge Mark Maples that there was an open case in Youth Court, that there were CPS findings in relation to the Chancery case despite the MDCPS Findings letter stating that the allegations were unsubstantiated, stated that the defendant still needed to allow CPS to investigate the home, and stated that the defendant still needed to submit to a drug screen. There is no Youth Court case open against the defendant, defendant has fully complied with the MDCPS investigation, allowed the MDCPS case worker to come into the home and then happily and willingly submitted to and passed a drug screen at MDCPS's request. The GAL even presented the Court with a copy of the MDCPS Findings letter and requested to have it marked as an Exhibit. However, Matt Lott decided to stand in court and lie through his slimy teeth and caused the judge to refuse to hear the motion. I understand defending your client but it is downright unethical, unprofessional, and unlawful for an attorney to show up and lie in open court in order to intentionally cause confusion so that he can prolong a case that should have never existed in the first place that has already been prolonged for three years because he uses unethical and unlawful tactics like this. This slimy "family law attorney" does not uphold his oath and he clearly seeks to destroy innocent families as long as he can benefit from it.